Convention or protraction....?
Convention or protraction....?
Hamadallah Al.Sarkhi
the reality of the situation faced by the people and that the occupation forces practice now realistic on the Iraqi arena of all the negative aspects that occur by the members of the Security Council of the opposition and those who approve the Convention on the withdrawal of the forces, which represent their' viewpoint in the reasons for rejection or shortcomings that inducing the Convention. The question here is in this situation that if these pitfalls already exist in the reality of the pension without the presence of the Convention any they are protected by other resolutions to practice what they want any without control or the will of the State in any thing until the opposite is true, Known
a cursory look at the Convention, we find that it is investigating the prevention or to identify many of the practices of the powers and the possible return to the country of sovereignty with the scheduling of withdrawal clear, specific and known with the confirmation of the other party to help Iraq out of chapter seventh because it will facilitate others to join the voice of the United Kingdom in support to such a resolution. It would be reluctant to Russia, France and China when Iraq to submit his request to lift sanctions? Does this not good for the Iraqi people?
Incomplete sovereignty or fragile immunity and have the heaven and the earth and water command and moves in which nothing formal or informal but maintained or consent of any it (the control and give the approvals and controlled by the approvals takes). hastened the politicians and gentlemen house before others because they exercise them before others as they direct contact, and these forces have the absolute in everything by virtue of international resolutions.
The other thing is also known that no army in the world (respect himself) even if the Iraqi army was allowed to another State, especially if he represents the force in an occupation or assistance to subject its soldiers under judicial custody of the State known considerations. How can the Army of the United States of America which courtesy a lot of items related to the guardianship jurisdiction even if it did not abide by it. This situation will open in the Baba difficult closed in the treaties and agreements with other States. We are far from the logic when we condemn the other party wants to offer to his soldiers and military sectors in the camps of the protection order or leisure and the use of the facilities and the areas agreed upon until the end of the operations of the comprehensive withdrawal.
I ask. How can we ask pushed the United States to use its influence, its Chairman for the purpose of protecting our money and ask us protected in return ( with the difference of course) because the owners of human tickle implicitly to the second paragraph of article twenty one.
Since the article thirty frank in determining the duration of the Convention and how to end the matter Albin that any of the parties may terminate this agreement before the time, the question of consistent with what we want from the speed of ending the occupation, when they see our politicians agree elders, in line with the desire of the new American president to withdraw its forces within 16 months.
On notebook pcs that this Convention is another version of the decision to extend the work of troops but a group of three years or less with the consideration that we won the best things of the extension decision. The two cases that require a decision and an agreement on the desire of the Iraqi party and the approval of the US side!!!!!!! Which is the best ???????
a cursory look at the Convention, we find that it is investigating the prevention or to identify many of the practices of the powers and the possible return to the country of sovereignty with the scheduling of withdrawal clear, specific and known with the confirmation of the other party to help Iraq out of chapter seventh because it will facilitate others to join the voice of the United Kingdom in support to such a resolution. It would be reluctant to Russia, France and China when Iraq to submit his request to lift sanctions? Does this not good for the Iraqi people?
Incomplete sovereignty or fragile immunity and have the heaven and the earth and water command and moves in which nothing formal or informal but maintained or consent of any it (the control and give the approvals and controlled by the approvals takes). hastened the politicians and gentlemen house before others because they exercise them before others as they direct contact, and these forces have the absolute in everything by virtue of international resolutions.
The other thing is also known that no army in the world (respect himself) even if the Iraqi army was allowed to another State, especially if he represents the force in an occupation or assistance to subject its soldiers under judicial custody of the State known considerations. How can the Army of the United States of America which courtesy a lot of items related to the guardianship jurisdiction even if it did not abide by it. This situation will open in the Baba difficult closed in the treaties and agreements with other States. We are far from the logic when we condemn the other party wants to offer to his soldiers and military sectors in the camps of the protection order or leisure and the use of the facilities and the areas agreed upon until the end of the operations of the comprehensive withdrawal.
I ask. How can we ask pushed the United States to use its influence, its Chairman for the purpose of protecting our money and ask us protected in return ( with the difference of course) because the owners of human tickle implicitly to the second paragraph of article twenty one.
Since the article thirty frank in determining the duration of the Convention and how to end the matter Albin that any of the parties may terminate this agreement before the time, the question of consistent with what we want from the speed of ending the occupation, when they see our politicians agree elders, in line with the desire of the new American president to withdraw its forces within 16 months.
On notebook pcs that this Convention is another version of the decision to extend the work of troops but a group of three years or less with the consideration that we won the best things of the extension decision. The two cases that require a decision and an agreement on the desire of the Iraqi party and the approval of the US side!!!!!!! Which is the best ???????
(( published in the newspaper al-Sabah the number 1547 dated 26\11\2008))
Translation by (( www.freetranslation.com ))
Comments
Post a Comment